As an Agile
Coach, we often interact with our customer predominantly in two modes – as
paternalistically or as an information provider. While working in
paternalistically mode we treat customers as kids who need to be told what is
good for them and what to do to achieve success. Consider a scenario where you
are trying to convince your customer to embrace Agile and explaining the
benefits they will get from it.
On the other
hand, when we are acting as an information provider, we just hand out the
information to the customer (yes, sometimes we overwhelm customers with
information) and ask them to make a decision about something about which they
have little or almost none understanding. Explain the difference between Scrum
and Kanban to the CTO without encouraging him to experiment with a small set of
teams. Now CTO has commended – All development teams will follow Scrum while
Support Teams will move to Kanban.
In both of
these cases either we as an Agile coach playing the role of Know All or of a
consultant - I gave you information, you decide. Both of these approaches may
lead to not so optimum results.
There is
also a third approach, which I learned from Being Mortal by Dr. Atul Gawande.
Dr. Atul talks about patients which are terminally ill. There are few medicines
and procedures are available which may extend the life of the patient but it
has consequences in terms of financials, longevity gained, and quality of
life. In these situations instead to
being paternalistic or being a consultant, he has to lay bare all the facts and
consequences of each decision patient and family can make. Though the final
decision to be made by patient and family, he plays a dual role of facilitator
and information provider. Sometimes patient and family make a decision of not
administering the medicine or accepting the medical procedure which is very
much against his Hippocratic Oath – save lives at any cost. Though as an Agile
Coach, I hope none of us has to be in midst of such a difficult situation but
we may have to suggest Agile is not the desired approach in some cases. I admit
in this approach, I as an Agile coach has pay dual role of facilitator and
information provider while agreeing with a decision which goes against my very
belief – Agile is for all in all situations.
What do you
think?
No comments:
Post a Comment